Project Experience

Scenario 1: Prototype Equipment Under Schedule Pressure

Context

A PE-owned walk-in cooler and freezer manufacturer required development and installation of a new foam-in-place (FIP) press to support production expansion. The project involved prototype equipment with no prior build reference.

Core Challenges

  • Engineering and fabrication occurring concurrently

  • Aggressive delivery schedule driven by production needs

  • Limited internal millwright resources

  • Uncertain supply chain availability and lead times

Role & Technical Ownership

Mike served as the technical owner responsible for translating evolving requirements into executable engineering and coordinated execution.

Responsibilities included:

  • Procurement strategy and vendor coordination

  • Oversight of fabrication and assembly

  • Installation leadership and on-site execution support

Outcome

The assembly cell was delivered and integrated into production with minimal disruption. Maintaining a single technical owner allowed evolving requirements to be addressed without compromising schedule or budget discipline.

Context

Core Challenges

Scenario 2: Process Cell Development with Evolving Requirements

A PE-owned manufacturer required development of a custom noise abatement barrier and panel assembly cell within an active production environment, while product specifications and throughput requirements continued to evolve.

  • Short timeline and tight budget constraints

  • Changing product specifications

  • Supply chain disruptions

  • Simultaneous equipment and process development

Role & Technical Ownership

IPM provided end-to-end technical ownership across equipment design and process integration.

Responsibilities included:

  • Custom equipment mechanical design

  • Vendor management and procurement

  • Coordination of fabrication and assembly

  • Installation and startup support

  • Technical input to overall process development

Outcome

The assembly cell was delivered and integrated into production with minimal disruption. Maintaining a single technical owner allowed evolving requirements to be addressed without compromising schedule or budget discipline.

Scenario 3: OEM Equipment Delivery with High Customer Visibility

Context

A coating equipment OEM was responsible for delivering and installing a large outdoor cure oven system for a high-profile industrial end user. At the time, Mike was part of the OEM’s engineering organization supporting a customer-facing capital project.

Core Challenges

  • No formal project management structure for large installations

  • Mechanical scope beyond internal engineering norms

  • Multiple third-party vendors (structural, controls, construction)

  • Aggressive schedule and demanding customer expectations

  • Weather-related delays during outdoor installation

Role & Technical Ownership

Mike served as the mechanical engineering lead and de facto project manager, acting as the primary technical owner across engineering, vendors, and field execution.

Responsibilities included:

  • Mechanical engineering leadership and design coordination

  • Managing third-party vendors and subcontractors

  • Acting as technical liaison between OEM and end user

  • On-site leadership during installation and commissioning

Outcome

The system was successfully built, installed, and commissioned despite elevated complexity and schedule pressure. Clear technical ownership stabilized execution and supported successful delivery on a high-visibility project.

Scenario 4: Manufacturing Line Scale -Up, Relocation and Decommissioning

Context

A photovoltaic panel manufacturing startup required leadership across multiple phases of manufacturing system development — including equipment fabrication, plant decommissioning, relocation, and installation of new thin-film coating lines.

Core Challenges

  • Uncertain timelines and funding conditions

  • Demoralized workforce during transitions

  • Stringent environmental and EH&S requirements

  • Corporate facilities, Lean, and compliance oversight

  • Maintaining operational capability during transition

  • Underestimated facility infrastructure requirements

Role & Technical Ownership

Across multiple roles, Mike provided production, operations, and technical project leadership spanning planning through execution.

Responsibilities included:

  • Leadership of equipment assembly for R&D and pilot manufacturing

  • Planning and execution of plant decommissioning activities

  • Vendor selection, budgeting, and scheduling for new installations

  • Utility and facility coordination

  • Alignment with corporate environmental, facilities, and operational standards

Outcome

Complex manufacturing systems were built, relocated, and installed while maintaining operational continuity and meeting corporate compliance requirements. The work demonstrated the importance of sustained technical ownership across long-horizon, multi-phase manufacturing initiatives.